Search Results for "statutory arbitration agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "statutory arbitration agreement"

964 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 964 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petitioner's Application for Appointment of Retired District Judge as Sole Arbitrator Granted Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Notice.

16 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s Bafna Udyog, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Arbitration Petition to District Court Nashik Under Section 42 of Arbitration Act — Prior Section 9 Petition Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction. The court held that the District Court at Nashik, having first entertained a Section 9 petition, has exclusive jurisdiction over all subsequent applications, including a Section 34 petition, despite a later Section 11 application before the High Court.

15 May 2020

The case involves a dispute between Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (the applicant/petitioner) and the Union of India (the respondent) arising from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Execution of Foreign Decrees by Mauritius-Based Companies Against Indian Debtors Under Section 44A CPC. The court held that decrees from reciprocating territories are directly executable in India without a fresh suit, and the Commercial Division has jurisdiction over such applications.

26 Apr 2018

The judgment involves three execution applications filed by foreign decree holders (Global Asia Venture Company, Matrix Partners India Investment Hold...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Facilitation Council Award for Interest on Delayed Payments Under MSMED Act — Limitation Period for Reference Not Applicable. The court held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is a complete code and the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to references made under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act.

15 Nov 2016

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and others, successors of the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Boar...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sale-Cum-Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2015

The petitioner, MSRT Corporation, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Land Licence Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination. The court held that the arbitration clause is independent and not extinguished by termination of the agreement, and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Dec 2013

The applicant, M/s Navkar Corporation Limited, entered into a land licence agreement with the respondent, Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railway,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver for Possession of Flats for Demolition and Reconstruction. Court holds that disputes regarding redevelopment of a cooperative housing society are not arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as they involve statutory rights and obligations under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

18 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Bharat Infrastructure and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Disputes Between Landowners and Housing Society Referred to Arbitration. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause in Development Agreement Mandates Reference Despite Pending Suit.

19 Nov 2010

The petitioners, who are the trustees of Framjee Dinshaw Petit Parsee Sanitorium and owners of land on which a building for respondent No.1, a co-oper...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)