Search Results for "restraining appointment"

652 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 652 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MSRTC to Consider Appointment of Petitioner from Open Category in Clerk-Typist Recruitment. Petitioner Belonging to NT(D) Category Entitled to Be Considered from Open Female Category When No Posts Reserved for Her Category.

The petitioner, Smita D/o Mahendra Jadhor, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) to co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition Against Commercial Court in Arbitration Matter. Commercial Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Petitioner Estopped from Challenging Jurisdiction After Having Earlier Invoked It.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the LXXXV Additional City Civil a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Compensatory Appointment Despite Pending Civil Suit — Pendency of Civil Suit Regarding Title Does Not Bar Consideration of Rehabilitation Claim Under Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957.

The petitioners, Mirabai Namdeo Gaurkar and her son Raju Namdeo Gaurkar, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 05-12-2020 from Weste...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices. Arbitration Agreement Found Valid Through Sales Terms and Conditions on Website and Invoices Accepted by Respondent.

The applicant, Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd., a distributor of computer products, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Guardian for Elderly Litigant in Property Dispute — No Evidence of Mental Incapacity Found. Court Holds That Advanced Age Alone Does Not Justify Appointment of Next Friend Under Order XXXII Rule 15 CPC.

The dispute arose between siblings over a flat in Matru Chhaya, Marine Drive, Mumbai, inherited from their father. The respondent No.1, aged 75, was t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Court Receiver in Property Dispute Between Family Members Over Sonal Building and Flat No.3A. Court Receiver appointed under Order XL CPC for building and flat, with power to appoint agent for use on payment of compensation.

The present Notice of Motion was taken out by the plaintiff, Rohit Vanmalidas Mehta, in a suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The dispute perta...