Search Results for "mandate termination"

804 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 804 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be initiated against directors without specific averments of their role in the company's affairs.

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) challenging a common order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition for Regularization of Services of Gram Panchayat Employee; Examines Applicability of Umadevi (2006) 4 SCC 1 to Long-Serving Gram Panchayat Employees.

The petitioner, a retired Gram Panchayat employee, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010068412019_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Assignee in Pending Arbitral Proceedings Under Section 15 of Arbitration Act. Assignment of debt includes right to continue arbitration; unilateral appointment of arbitrator by original lender does not invalidate substitution.

The applicant, Integro Finserv Private Limited, an NBFC, filed three applications under Section 14 read with Section 11 read with Section 15 of the Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...