KAHC010480352008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "interim possession"
3903 result(s) found
Found 3903 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Property Suit as Barred by Limitation — Failure to Disclose Cause of Action Within Three Years of Knowledge of Alleged Fraud Leads to Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud in 2015 or earlier triggered the limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the suit filed in 2021 was beyond the prescribed period.
18 Jul 2022The plaintiff, Ramesh Mali, filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction in respect of certain properties originally owned by his deceased father, ...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Demolition Notice Case. Court holds that demolition notices under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 require prior show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing, upholding trial court's order setting aside notices.
1 Dec 2025The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (appellant) filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which set aside demolition n...
- 305
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against NCDRC Order Holding Interim Moratorium Under IBC Section 96 Does Not Stay Execution of Penalty Orders Under Consumer Protection Act. Consumer Penalties Are Not 'Debt' Under IBC and Execution Proceedings Under Section 27 CP Act Are Criminal in Nature, Not Civil Recovery.
4 Mar 2025The present appeal was filed against the final judgment and order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), wherein multi...
- 523
High Court
High Court Issues Directions in Slum Rehabilitation Writ Petitions; Expresses Grave Concern Over Alleged Fraud. No Final Verdict; Ongoing Investigation into Trafficking of Tenements and Non-Fixation of Transit Rent Under SRA Circular.
20 Jun 2023The Bombay High Court issued a detailed common order in a batch of writ petitions filed by slum dwellers of the Kolekalyan Slum Rehabilitation Authori...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Adverse Inference and Denial of Cross-Examination in Commercial Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as No Perversity or Arbitrariness Shown Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.
30 Jul 2025The petitioner, Sivagami N., was the first defendant in a commercial suit (Com.OS 64/2022) pending before the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
29 Apr 2016The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...
- 271
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.
15 Jun 2026The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...
- 96
High Court
- 80
High Court
- 77
