Search Results for "firm name"

2363 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2363 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld as Complaint Did Not Disclose Prima Facie Case.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Considers Election Petition Alleging Improper Rejection of Nomination Under Section 9A of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Petitioner Claims Retirement from Partnership Firm Removed Disqualification Before Scrutiny Date.

The petitioner, a former partner in M/s. Musale Construction, intended to contest the 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election from 49-Saoner co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders in Suit Under Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in Findings of Courts Below.

The petitioner, M/s Columbia Hospital & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant No.9 in a suit filed by respondent No.1, M/s Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Sets Aside Appellate Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Independent Reasoning Renders Appellate Judgment Unsustainable.

The appellant (defendant) challenged the judgment of the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn.) Hubballi in RA No.126/2004 dated 12.12.2006, which rever...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. Complainant Established Ingredients Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Accused Failed to Discharge Reverse Burden Under Section 139.

The appellant, Suresh Nakra, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Murugesan Ad...