Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

391 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

6 Nov 2020

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of First Appeals in Land Acquisition Matters — No Outcome Provided. Multiple First Appeals Filed by State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, and Landowners Seeking Enhancement/Reduction of Compensation.

1 Jan 1970

The judgment text provided only lists the title and case numbers of multiple First Appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction....

High Court

High Court of Bombay Stayed Impugned Re-Assessment Proceedings Under Income Tax Act – Challenge to Section 148 Notice for AY 2009-2010. Petition Filed Against Order Rejecting Objections and Seeking Re-Opening of Assessment Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

25 Apr 2025

...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that petitioners failed to prove tenancy rights under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

25 Feb 2014

The petitioners, Pradip Vasudeo Ekbote and others, filed four writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revision Against Enhancement of Maintenance Under Section 127 CrPC — Husband's Income and Wife's Earning Capacity Considered. The court reduced maintenance from Rs.7,000 to Rs.5,000 per month per applicant, holding that the wife's earning capacity and the husband's actual income must be properly assessed.

12 Apr 2023

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Gajanan Mandekar (husband) challenging the Family Court's order enhancing maintenance payab...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Preliminary Objections to Jurisdiction in Originating Summons for Interpretation of Trust Deed. Clause 11(v) of the Trust Deed Held Not to Exclude Court's Jurisdiction; Section 80 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act Does Not Bar the Originating Summons.

5 Mar 2012

The judgment arises from an Originating Summons filed by the plaintiff, a permanent trustee of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, a public tru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

7 Apr 2014

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Disposes Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals Filed Under Section 173(1) of MV Act. Batch of appeals against MACT awards involving compensation enhancement and insurance liability disputes.

22 Dec 2020

The provided text is a compilation of multiple Motor Accident Claims appeals (MFA) listed before the Karnataka High Court, Kalaburagi Bench on 22 Dece...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)