Search Results for "cause title amendment"

1708 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1708 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short Delivery of Urea Due to Lack of Title to Sue Under Bill of Lading. Plaintiff Not a Party to Bill of Lading and Cannot Maintain Admiralty Action for Short Landing.

The plaintiff, Dreymoor Fertilizers Overseas Pte. Ltd., filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. Theoforos-1 claiming short delivery of 520.30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Partition Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory — Trial Court's Rejection Quashed on Payment of Costs.

The petitioner, Sri S. Indushekhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25/11/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Exemption for Bonded Warehouse Sales Under Section 5(2) of Central Sales Tax Act. Legal Issue Concerned Whether Transfer of Documents Before Filing Bill of Entry for Home Consumption Constitutes Sale in Course of Import Before Crossing Customs Frontiers.

The matter concerned two sales tax references made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arisin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...