Search Results for "auction purchasers"

261 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 261 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Attachment Order in Execution Proceedings Due to Lack of Notice Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC. Petitioners' Property Attached Without Prior Notice Despite Being Third-Party Purchasers, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Shashikant Arvindkumar Rajput and others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Appellate Order in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Tampering. Disconnection of Electricity Supply Without Proof of Theft or Tampering Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 Held Illegal.

The present petition was filed by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd and another (the petitioners) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Detention Orders for Lack of Proper Adjudication. Detention orders under Section 129 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 quashed for violating natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was given and orders were unreasoned.

The petitioner, Bharat Co Operative Bank Mumbai Ltd, filed two writ petitions challenging detention orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Revenue Entry — Petitioner's Name to Continue in Revenue Records. Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Bona Fide Purchase Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The petitioner, Sintex Power Limited, purchased agricultural land in Village Lunsapur, Taluka Jafrabad, District Amreli, Gujarat, comprising Survey No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Permission for Sale of Trust Property Under Section 36 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The Court Held That the Charity Commissioner's Refusal Was Justified as the Trust Failed to Show Urgent Necessity or Benefit to the Trust.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 19.4.2005 passed by the Charity Commissioner, Pune, refusing permission unde...