Search Results for "acquisition complete"

1617 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1617 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Agriculturalists Against State of Maharashtra and Land Acquisition Authorities. Petitions Pertain to Land Acquisition for Irrigation Projects, with Petitioners Seeking Relief from Acquisition Proceedings.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by agriculturalists from various districts in Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Declaring Lapse of Reservation for Garden Under MRTP Act, 1966 Due to Failure to Acquire Within One Year of Notice. Reservation Lapses Absolutely as No Declaration Under Section 126 Was Published Despite Proposal to Collector.

The petitioners, owners of two parcels of land in Borivali, Mumbai, filed writ petitions seeking a declaration that the reservation of their lands for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Absence of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent factual findings by lower courts upheld as appellants failed to establish any legal error in dismissal of suit for injunction and adverse possession claim under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The dispute originated from a Regular Civil Suit filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against the State of Gujarat and its officers to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025

...