Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

1005 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1005 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 325 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Naga, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-IV, Mysore, for the offence punishable under Section 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.

The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits 18 Accused in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Object Not Proved — State Appeals Dismissed. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 326, 427, 504, 506 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish common object and individual overt acts.

The judgment pertains to three connected criminal appeals arising from a single incident of murder and rioting. The appellants (original accused nos. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 324 and 342 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Puttasiddamma @ Puttasiddi and Samandaiah, were convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.50/2013 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Filed by Convicts in Akshardham Temple Terror Attack Case. Appeals Challenge Convictions Under POTA, IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act for Conspiracy and Murder of 33 Persons.

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused-appellants challenging their conviction and sentences awarded by the ...