Search Results for "Rule 330"

376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Transfer as Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of Employee After 28 Years of Service to Chennai Held Malafide and Without Justification Under Items 3 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Sulzer Pumps India Private Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Thane, which declared that the employer had engag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Demolition of Illegal Structures in CRZ Area. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to retain unauthorized constructions violating CRZ Notification 2011 and Environment Protection Act, 1986.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by 30 individuals challenging the demolition of their structures by the Goa Coastal Zone Management ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Carriage of Goods by Sea Case — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Due to Non-Service of Summons. Service of summons on agent of foreign principal held insufficient to bind the principal under Order 5 Rule 12 of CPC, 1908.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 18 October 2014 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay in SC Suit No.7175 of 1997. The plaintiff, D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenu. Failure to Serve Grounds in English to South African National Who Does Not Know English Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of PITNDPS Act.

The petitioner, Agisilaos Demetriades, a South African national, challenged an order of detention dated 21.09.2021 passed by Respondent No.2, the Join...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Trust Office Bearers. Scheme of Administration Does Not Prohibit No-Confidence Motion; Resolution Valid Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

The petitioners, Lakhichand Marotrao Dhoble and Kisangopal Chunnilalji Gandhi, were the Chairman and Treasurer respectively of a public trust named Sh...