Search Results for "Rule 222"

661 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 661 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Probate — Secondary Evidence of Will Held Admissible Despite Non-Production of Original. Attestation Proved Through Scribe's Son and Attesting Witness's Daughter; Delay and Exclusion of Heirs Not Suspicious.

The present appeal was filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the original Opponents against the judgment d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.

The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003

The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.

The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence and Appeal in Familial Homicide – Accused Claims Exception Under Section 300 IPC for Grave and Sudden Provocation Based on Alleged Impotency Remarks.

The case arose from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Solapur under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Disposes of Appeals and Revision in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 120-B of IPC and Section 8 of Goa Children's Act, 2003, was Challenged by Accused, and State Appealed Against Set-Off under Section 428 CrPC.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard together five criminal appeals and one criminal revision application arising from the judgment and order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice Under Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 2012. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Article 300A of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Kureshi Irfanbhai Mohammadsharifbhai and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...