KAHC010022932010_1
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...
Search Results for "Rule 20(7)"
760 result(s) found
Found 760 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to BDA Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary Notification Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Final Notification Under BDA Act, 1976.
11 Jul 2014This batch of writ petitions was filed by various land owners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition not...
- 108
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased's Income Reassessed at Rs. 6,000 per Month with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 17. The Court held that the Tribunal's assessment of income and multiplier was erroneous and enhanced compensation from Rs. 42,77,360 to Rs. 10,92,000 with 8% interest.
18 Jun 2015The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the widow and parents of the deceased, Narendra Rajarao Sulakhe, who died in a road acci...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Forest Corporation's Appeals Against Reinstatement of Daily Wage Workers. Daily wage employees with 240 days of continuous service are entitled to reinstatement under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
24 Dec 2025The case involves multiple Letters Patent Appeals filed by the Divisional Manager, Forest Development Corporation, Nashik, against the reinstatement o...
- 134
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Allegations of Police Brutality and Illegal Detention in Wake of Idgah Vandalism. Petitioners Claim Compensation and Quashing of FIR for Alleged Violation of Fundamental Rights During Investigation.
15 Jul 2014The criminal writ petition arose from allegations of police brutality following damage to a Gumbaj of an Idgah in Sindkheda, Dhule district. The ten p...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Confirms Death Sentence for Four Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case — Conviction Under Sections 396, 397, 302, 120-B, 201 IPC and Section 98 Karnataka Police Act Upheld. The court found the evidence of last seen, recovery of stolen articles, and extra-judicial confession sufficient to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category for death penalty.
5 Jul 2016The case pertains to a dacoity and murder incident that occurred on 14.2.2009 at about 11.45 p.m. in Saidapur Police Station limits, Yadgir District. ...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.
8 Aug 2024The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...
- 1158
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under UAPA and IPC for Alleged CPI (Maoist) Links. The Court Examined Legality of Conviction Under Sections 13, 18, 20, 38, 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Read With Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code Based on Seizure of Maoist Literature and Electronic Evidence.
14 Oct 2022The judgment excerpt relates to two criminal appeals before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, arising from a common judgment and order dated ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.
20 Aug 2024The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...
- 364
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Multiplex Owners' Right to Entertainment Tax Subsidy Under Goa Scheme — State's Denial of Subsidy on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions Set Aside. The court applied promissory estoppel and liberal interpretation of the Goa Entertainment Tax based Subsidy for Cinema Houses (Theatres) Scheme, 2004 to hold that multiplex owners are entitled to subsidy equal to entertainment tax paid.
12 Mar 2019The State of Goa appealed against two judgments of the District Judge, North Goa, which directed the State to pay subsidy to multiplex owners under th...
- 107
