Search Results for "Public Services"

6078 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6078 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.

A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Cut-off Date for Workmen Dues in Winding Up of Swadeshi Mills. Official Liquidator's Calculation Up to Appointment of Provisional Liquidator Challenged by Workmen Seeking Dues Up to Winding Up Order.

The matter concerns a company application filed by five workmen of M/s Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd., which was wound up. The company had approximately 2970...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Contractual Breach Without Deception Does Not Attract Section 420 IPC.

The petitioner, Sussanne Khan, a sole proprietor of a design firm, was engaged by the respondent no. 3, Mudhit Gupta, under a written contract to prov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Case — Held that ITAT Correctly Deleted Addition for Non-Compete Fee Paid to AE Without Adequate Justification. The court found no substantial question of law as the Tribunal's findings were factual and not perverse.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against...