Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty on Medicinal Preparation Containing Dextropropoxyphene. Product 'Lobain' Held Taxable Under M&TP Act Regardless of Dosage.

The petitioner, DWD Pharmaceuticals Ltd., challenged an order by Respondent No.5 which upheld earlier orders by Respondent No.4 and Respondent No.3, h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Makes Arbitration Award Rule of Court in Favour of Petitioner Despite Pending Supreme Court Appeal. No Stay of Execution Obtained by Respondent, Award Enforceable Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, seeking to make an arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Pioneer Publicity Corporation and Airport Authority of India. Dispute arises from unilateral reduction of hoarding size from 8,000 sq ft to 5,000 sq ft and failure to refund security deposit.

The applicant, Pioneer Publicity Corporation Pvt Ltd, was the successful tenderer for a contract with the Airport Authority of India (AAI) for display...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Bunkers Arrest Case. Bunkers on board a ship can be arrested and sold separately under admiralty jurisdiction as they are not part of the ship.

The appellant, Mansel Limited, a Bermuda company engaged in chartering vessels, filed an admiralty suit seeking arrest of bunkers on board the vessel ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objection Despite Dismissal of Main Appeal for Non-Removal of Office Objections. Cross Objection under Section 253(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is an independent proceeding and does not abate with dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a Cross Objection filed by Cipla Limited (the assessee) under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in response to an Income T...