APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995
16 Dec 2005The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...
Search Results for "Municipal Corporation Resolution"
1406 result(s) found
Found 1406 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision Setting Aside NCLT Orders Approving Resolution Plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited. Dispute Involves GNIDA's Claim Over Land Leased to Special Purpose Company and Its Subsidiaries, and the Validity of Resolution Plans Under IBC.
5 Mar 2026The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 30.01.2...
- 414
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.
8 Aug 2018The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs State and Municipal Corporation to Remove Unauthorized Religious Structures in Public Interest Litigation. Illegal Shrines Built After Supreme Court Cutoff Date Must Be Demolished Without Delay, and Older Structures Must Be Categorized for Regularization, Relocation, or Removal.
1 Oct 2016The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Society for Fast Justice and another petitioner highlighting the failure of the State of Maharashtra and t...
- 24
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 312
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. in Insolvency Case — Holds That Statutory Charge Under Electricity Supply Agreement Survives Liquidation and Must Be Respected Under IBC. The Court ruled that a charge created under Section 53 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with contractual terms is not extinguished by the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the liquidator must treat the appellant as a secured creditor.
1 Jan 2023The appellant, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (PVVNL), a state electricity distribution company, entered into an electricity supply agreement ...
- 186
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Entry Tax on Industrial Townships — Industrial Townships Can Be Treated as 'Local Area' Under Entry 52 List II. Inclusion of industrial townships in definition of 'local area' for entry tax is constitutionally valid and does not violate Article 243-Q.
4 Nov 2022The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals challenging the validity of entry tax levied on goods entering industrial townships under the Orissa E...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Candidature in Municipal Elections. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish that the respondent was not a Hindu or that he was not a member of the Scheduled Caste community, and that the Caste Scrutiny Committee's decision was not challenged.
11 Jun 2012The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Smt. Chaitrali Prakash Borhade and Prem Seva Mahila Mandal & Anr. challenging the candidature of Raj...
- 122
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003
21 Dec 2018The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Flyover Construction in Pune for Lack of Public Interest and Maintainability. The court held that the PIL was motivated by political rivalry and not genuine public interest, and imposed costs on the petitioner.
22 Mar 2024The petitioner, Ravindra Hemraj Dhangekar, a sitting Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) from Pune, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) chal...
- 45
