Search Results for "Execution petition maintainability"

1003 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1003 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Charter Hire Dispute. Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Provide for Appeal Against Interim Orders Under Section 17 of the Act.

The case involves an appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute and Teacher Recruitment Cases — Upholds Single Judge's Orders on Limitation and Selection Process. In LPA No.177/2012, appeal dismissed as barred by limitation; in LPA No.288/2011, selection of respondent upheld as per rules.

The judgment comprises two Letters Patent Appeals. LPA No.177/2012 arises from a land dispute where the appellants challenged an order of a Single Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court Held That No Substantial Question of Law Arises When Both Lower Courts Concurrently Found That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...