Search Results for "Developer Appointment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Developer Appointment"

322 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — Directs Deposit of Rs.12.5 Crores and Appointment of Court Receiver. Clause 6 of MOU for Refund on Default Forms Basis for Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Apr 2013

The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the respondent, a developer, on 29 July 2011 for development ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

18 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Apr 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Sets Aside Injunction Against Company Not a Party to Arbitration Agreement. Court Holds That Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Cannot Be Granted Against a Third Party Not Signatory to Arbitration Clause.

3 Dec 2015

The appeal arose from a partnership dispute between respondent Nos. 1 and 2 who had formed a firm named M/s Kasliwal Empires for a housing project in ...

High Court

High Court Issues Directions in Slum Rehabilitation Writ Petitions; Expresses Grave Concern Over Alleged Fraud. No Final Verdict; Ongoing Investigation into Trafficking of Tenements and Non-Fixation of Transit Rent Under SRA Circular.

20 Jun 2023

The Bombay High Court issued a detailed common order in a batch of writ petitions filed by slum dwellers of the Kolekalyan Slum Rehabilitation Authori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Co-operative Court Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Society's General Body Resolution for Redevelopment Upheld Over Member's Challenge. The court held that a dispute under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 must touch the business of the society, and a challenge to a General Body resolution for redevelopment does not fall within its purview.

23 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Nutan Jaibharat Co-operative Housing Society Limited, a co-operative housing society with 47 members, filed a writ petition challengin...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA NOC for Reconstruction — Neighboring Society Failed to Prove Fraud or Infringement of Rights. NOC under DCR 33(7) for reconstruction of cessed building was valid as FSI of 2.5 did not depend on number of tenements and allegations of bogus tenancies were disputed questions of fact not suitable for writ jurisdiction.

28 Jun 2006

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 226 filed by a neighbouring cooperative housing society and its member challenging a No Objection...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession. Court holds that mere possession of property documents does not establish ownership and that plaintiffs must prove their title independently.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiffs, claiming to be owners and in possession of a plot of land in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Interim Payment of Fees and Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Architectural Services. Court holds that Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be used to enforce payment of disputed fees without a final adjudication, and that an injunction against termination or redevelopment would be inequitable.

8 Dec 2022

The petitioners, a partnership firm and its partner engaged in architectural services, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Concili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Saleable FSI and Possession of Property. Court restrains respondents from alienating saleable FSI and disturbing possession pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Apr 2012

The petitioners, Atul Resorts and Hospitality India Pvt. Ltd. and Atul Projects India Ltd., filed two arbitration petitions under Section 9 of the Arb...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)