Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

386 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.

15 Sep 2005

The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes. The court held that writ petitions against mutation entries are not maintainable when alternative remedy under Section 247 of MLRC is available.

5 Dec 2023

The judgment involves three writ petitions challenging mutation entries in revenue records. The petitioners in WP 9745/2011, WP 2755/2023, and WP 289/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

6 Feb 2024

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between family members. The appellants in SA-284-2019 were the original defendant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Order in Agricultural Land and Property Dispute — Appeals Filed by Legal Heirs of Narayanrao Nanasaheb Mane-Deshmukh Against Multiple Respondents. The appeals arise from orders of the trial court, the nature of which is not specified in the available text.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Single Judge Can Hear Petitions Under Article 226/227 Against Any Judicial/Quasi-Judicial Order, Not Limited to Listed Acts. The Full Bench resolves the conflict and clarifies that Rule 18 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 is procedural and does not restrict the Single Judge's jurisdiction to specific Acts.

4 Oct 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed by M/s. Magnum Opus IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd. under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit in O.S. No. 1949/80. Appeals Filed Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Challenging Trial Court's Rejection of Claim for Partition and Separate Possession.

1 Mar 2013

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

21 Aug 2015

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Execution — Consent Decree Not a Nullity Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That Undertakings Given to Court Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn and Execution Proceedings Are Continuation of Suit.

13 Jul 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the original Judgment Debtor No.2 (Firoz A Nadiadwala) and his proprietary firm Base Industries Group see...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Patta Validity Requires Proof of Abandonment or Revocation of Earlier Patta Under Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code.

9 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a land title dispute in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents-plaintiffs (Shiv Nath and deceased Vishwana...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)