Search Results for "Bombay Rent Act Eviction"

1142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Bonafide Requirement of Landlord Not Established. Landlord's claim for additional space for business expansion fails as it already had sufficient alternate accommodation and the need was not genuine.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant (M/s. Parmar Plastic Products & Ors.) against the judgment and order of the Appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Non-User and Landlord's Bonafide Requirement Under Bombay Rent Act. Tenant's occasional use of premises does not constitute continuous residence; landlord's need for own use justified eviction.

The dispute arises from a suit for eviction filed by the landlord (respondent) against the tenant (petitioner) under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodgi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision in Eviction Suit Based on Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Subsequent Induction of New Tenant in Adjacent Shop Not Relevant as It Was Not Part of Suit Property.

The case involves a suit for eviction filed by the owners (plaintiffs) against the tenants (defendants) in respect of two shops, on the ground of bona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Fixes Interim Compensation for Tenant Pending Eviction Revision — Mesne Profits Determined Based on Valuer Reports and Rental Market. Tenant Ordered to Pay Rs.25,000 Per Month as Interim Compensation Under Section 12 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant, Previn Govind Sharma, against an eviction decree passed by the Appellate Bench of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Under Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955 — Lease Expiry and Government Requirement Justify Eviction. Petitioner's challenge to eviction dismissed as lease had expired and premises were required for government purposes.

The petitioner, Laxmi B. Metkari, was a lessee of a commercial premises in Mumbai under a lease deed dated 13 June 1981, renewed until 28 September 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.

The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit Dismissed for Non-Prosecution. Dismissal of Suit for Possession Does Not Convert Tenant into Trespasser; Tenant Continues as Tenant.

The petitioners, who were tenants of a shop premises, were sued by the respondents (landlords) for possession and mesne profits. The trial court dismi...