Search Results for "BMC notice"

387 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 387 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 Against Interim Order Under Section 9 in Property Development Arbitration. The Impugned Order Granted Conditional Relief Including Injunction and Appointment of Receiver Pending Arbitration.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenged an order passed by a le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Challenging Resumption of Allotted Land. Concurrent findings of fact regarding non-compliance with conditions of allotment upheld.

The petitioner, Shikalgar Co-operative Housing Society, filed a writ petition in 2000 challenging two orders: one dated 06.03.1999 passed by the Colle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Recovery Due to Prior Arbitration Awards. The court held that the suit is barred by res judicata as the same claims were already adjudicated in arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

The plaintiff, Unique Integrated Transport & Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and its of...