Search Results for "security document"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "security document"

2127 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2127 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favour of Plaintiff-Builder Under Memorandum of Understanding. The court held that the Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.5.2011 constituted a binding agreement for sale and the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

5 May 2017

The appellant, M/s. Merces Builders Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.4.2016 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Panaji...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of BEST Undertaking Against Liquidator's Rejection of Interest Claim and Secured Creditor Status in Liquidation of Spark Green Energy. Interest-Free Deposit Does Not Attract Interest, and Unregistered Charge Does Not Confer Secured Status Under IBC.

1 Jan 2025

The appeal was filed by Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Mumbai B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside First Appellate Court's Decree and Restores Trial Court Dismissal; Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Plaintiff Did Not Admit Defendant's Title and Possession Was Not Hostile

25 Apr 2026

The dispute concerned agricultural land bearing Sy.No.113 measuring 8 acres 84 cents in Bellary district. The original plaintiff Smt. Hampamma filed a...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Against Dismissal of Interim Injunction Applications in Suit for Recovery of Mortgage Debt. Appellant Sought to Restrain Further Mortgage and Commercial Operations Pending Suit.

23 Nov 2024

The appeal arose from a recovery suit filed by M/s Gaurav Rose Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. against M/s Blue Horizon Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and others for Rs.5 cro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — No Prima Facie Case Made Out for Interim Relief. The court held that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for grant of temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC as the agreement of sale was unregistered and the claim appeared stale.

23 Nov 2024

The appellant, M/s. Gaurav Rose Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., filed a miscellaneous first appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 190...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. The court upheld concurrent findings that the plaintiff failed to prove the agreement and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

25 Oct 2016

The appellant, Manohar Pamandas Jani, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decre...

High Court

Regular First Appeal Against Common Judgment Decreeping Suit for Perpetual Injunction and Dismissing Suit for Declaration That Sale Deeds Are Not Binding on Co-Parceners. Dispute Centered on Whether Property Was Joint Family Asset or Self-Acquired and Validity of Sale Deeds Executed by Karta or Power of Attorney Holder.

27 Jan 2020

The appeals arose from two suits tried together. One suit (O.S.No.1611/1994) was filed by the plaintiffs, claiming to be co-parceners of an undivided ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

23 Jul 2019

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

8 Jan 2016

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Holds That Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Oral Agreement That Document Was Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. The court ruled that a defendant need not file a separate suit for specific performance to rely on an agreement of reconveyance as a defence.

17 Dec 2019

The present second appeal arises from a property dispute between the original plaintiff (respondent) and the original defendant (appellant). The plain...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)