Search Results for "reopening assessment"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBDT's Rejection of Delay Condonation for Filing Revised Income Tax Returns. Non-Speaking Order and Violation of Natural Justice Led to Remand for Fresh Consideration Under Section 119 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, CG Power and Industrial Solutions Ltd., a company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Income Tax Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Show That No Income Escaped Assessment.

The petitioner, Darshana Anand Damle, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Independent Application of Mind. Reassessment Based on Borrowed Satisfaction and Non-Speaking Order on Objections Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Arvind Sahdeo Gupta, challenged a notice dated 24/3/2020 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Office...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Assessment Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as based on same material already considered in original assessment under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Pushpa Nahata, challenged a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30 March 2022 and an assessment order dated 22 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening Case — Notice Under Section 148 Held Invalid as No Reasons Recorded. Assessee's Return Accepted Under Section 143(1) Cannot Be Reopened Without Proper Justification Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax) against the order of the Income...