Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material — Mere Change of Opinion Not Sufficient for Reassessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessing officer cannot reopen an assessment under Section 147 based on the same return already processed under Section 143(1) without any new tangible material, as it would amount to a mere change of opinion.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2013-14 declaring total income of Rs. 65,51,360/-. The return was accepted by the assessing officer under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Subsequently, the assessing officer issued a notice dated 28.3.2018 under Section 148 of the Act seeking to reopen the assessment. The reasons recorded for reopening stated that on verification of the ITR, it was seen that the assessee had worked out long-term capital gains on sale of a flat by taking the year of acquisition as 1992 and computing indexed cost of acquisition accordingly. The assessing officer noted that during assessment proceedings for A.Y. 2014-15, the assessee was requested to provide sources of investments made during that year. The petitioner challenged the notice on the ground that it was based on a mere change of opinion as there was no fresh material. The court, after hearing both sides, held that the reasons for reopening did not disclose any new tangible material and were based on the same return already processed under Section 143(1). The court quashed the notice, observing that reopening on the same set of facts without fresh material amounts to a change of opinion, which is not permissible under the law.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reopening of Assessment - Section 147, 148 Income Tax Act, 1961 - Change of Opinion - The assessing officer issued a notice to reopen assessment for A.Y. 2013-14 based on verification of the ITR which showed the assessee had used the cost inflation index for the year of acquisition as 1992 for computing long-term capital gains on sale of a flat. The court held that the reasons for reopening did not disclose any fresh material and were based on the same return already processed under Section 143(1), thus amounting to a mere change of opinion. The notice was quashed. (Paras 1-6)

B) Income Tax - Processing under Section 143(1) - Section 143(1) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Scope of Reassessment - The court observed that when a return is processed under Section 143(1) without scrutiny, the assessing officer cannot later reopen the assessment on the same set of facts without any new tangible material. The impugned notice was based on the same ITR which was already accepted, and no new information was brought on record. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notice for reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was valid when based on the same material already considered during the original assessment, constituting a mere change of opinion.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the notice dated 28.3.2018 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Reopening of assessment
  • change of opinion
  • lack of fresh material
  • Section 147
  • Section 148
  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (12) 110

WRIT PETITION NO. 3548 OF 2018

2018-12-14

Akil Kureshi, M.S. Sanklecha

Mihir Naniwadekar, Rohan Deshpande, Alisha Pinto, Sham Walve

Amarjeet Thapar

Income Tax Officer, Ward 24(1)(1) & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging notice for reopening of income tax assessment.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 28.3.2018 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Filing Reason

The assessing officer issued a notice to reopen assessment for A.Y. 2013-14 based on verification of the ITR, which the petitioner contended was a mere change of opinion without any fresh material.

Previous Decisions

The return of income for A.Y. 2013-14 was accepted under Section 143(1) of the Act.

Issues

Whether the notice for reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was valid when based on the same material already considered during the original assessment, constituting a mere change of opinion.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the reasons for reopening did not disclose any fresh material and were based on the same return already processed under Section 143(1), thus amounting to a mere change of opinion. Respondents argued that the reopening was justified as the verification of the ITR revealed that the assessee had used the cost inflation index for the year of acquisition as 1992, which required further examination.

Ratio Decidendi

Reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be based on a mere change of opinion. When a return is processed under Section 143(1) without scrutiny, the assessing officer cannot later reopen the assessment on the same set of facts without any new tangible material. The reasons recorded must disclose fresh material to justify reopening.

Judgment Excerpts

We have heard learned counsel for the parties for final disposal of the petition by consent. Petitioner has challenged a notice of reopening of assessment dated 28.3.2018. The reasons for reopening did not disclose any fresh material and were based on the same return already processed under Section 143(1), thus amounting to a mere change of opinion.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed return of income for A.Y. 2013-14 which was accepted under Section 143(1). Subsequently, the assessing officer issued a notice under Section 148 dated 28.3.2018 seeking to reopen the assessment. The petitioner challenged the notice by way of a writ petition before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 143(1), 147, 148
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material — Mere Change of Opinion Not Sufficient for Reassessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessing officer cannot reopen ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Shareholder's Application for Official Liquidator Supervision of SARFAESI Sale — Secured Creditor's Right to Sell Under SARFAESI Act Prevails Over Company Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction. The court held that a pro...