Search Results for "registration rules"

4151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty in Agreement Cancellation Case Due to Developer's Failure. Section 48(1) of Maharashtra Stamp Act does not bar refund when cancellation is for valid reasons and application is made within reasonable time.

The petitioners, Harshit Harish Jain and another, entered into an Agreement for Sale dated 30 August 2014 with M/s Krona Realties Private Limited for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Design Infringement Suit Transfer Case — Commercial Court at District Level Competent to Decide Cancellation of Design Under Section 22(4) of Designs Act, 2000. Transfer to High Court Not Mandatory Where High Court Lacks Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction.

The present appeal arose from a suit filed by the respondent, M/s. Mold Tek Packaging Ltd., against the appellant, S.D. Containers Indore, seeking a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax Liability on Sale of Discarded Materials by BEST Undertaking Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Court holds that sale of scrap from non-dealer activity is taxable under section 22(5A) and that appeal under section 55(6)(c) is maintainable only on questions of law.

The case involves two references under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a common order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over 'BADEMIYA' Mark. Plaintiffs' registered trademarks 'BADEMIYA'S' and 'BADEMIYA' in Classes 29 and 42 are infringed by defendant's use of 'BADEMIYAN' for similar food business.

The plaintiffs, a partnership firm and its partners, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendant. The plaintiffs' bu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Migrant Labourers in Suo Motu Writ Petition During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court ordered transportation, food provision, and withdrawal of prosecutions under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to address miseries caused by lockdown and pandemic fears.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the severe hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Ad-Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit for 'Orient' Electric Appliances. Plaintiff's Longstanding Use and Registration of 'Orient' Mark Found Sufficient for Interim Protection Against Defendants' Identical Mark.

The plaintiff, Orient Paper & Industries Limited, filed a suit before the Bombay High Court alleging trade mark infringement and passing off against d...