High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "notification bringing into force"
656 result(s) found
Found 656 result(s)
Supreme Court
"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."
5 Nov 2024The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...
- 760
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Tribal Chieftains in Land Acquisition Case Under Assam Lushai Hills District (Acquisition of Chief's Rights) Act, 1954. The petition was barred by delay and laches, and the acquisition of chiefs' lands with compensation under the Act did not violate fundamental rights to property.
13 Mar 2026The writ petition was filed by the Mizo Chief Council on behalf of tribal chieftains and their legal heirs from the erstwhile Lushai Hills district, n...
- 430
Supreme Court
Civil Appeals Filed Challenging Constitutional Validity of Madhya Pradesh Act and Rules Regulating Admissions, Fee, and Reservation in Private Unaided Professional Institutions. High Court Upheld Validity of Provisions on Admissions and Fee but Supreme Court's Final Decision Awaited on Reservation and Legislative Competence.
1 Aug 2026The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, which upheld the constitutional validity of the Niji Vyavasa...
- 62
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.
21 Apr 2022The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...
- 115
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal for Condonation of 837-Day Delay Due to Lack of Plausible Explanation — Administrative Apathy Not Sufficient Ground for Condonation Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.
9 Feb 2026The State of Gujarat and another (the applicants) filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 837 da...
- 91
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Developer Challenging Quashing of Environmental Clearance for Housing Project Near Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary. Project Located in Catchment Area of Sukhna Lake Requires Central Government Clearance Under Category 'A' of EIA Notification.
5 Nov 2019The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. (Tata HDCL) against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi, wh...
- 293
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal on Classification of Bid Lands Under Agricultural and Urban Land Ceiling Laws. The core issue is whether Bid lands of former princes are agricultural lands subject to ceiling under the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 or excluded under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
1 Aug 2026The State of Gujarat and the Mamlatdar filed a civil appeal in the Supreme Court against the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat which had set aside...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.
19 Nov 2022The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...
- 26
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of Delay of 3117 Days in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Sufficient Cause. Liberal Approach Adopted for Illiterate Claimants Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
12 Mar 2026The judgment pertains to a group of civil applications filed for condonation of delay in preferring first appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisi...
- 85
