Search Results for "non-compliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "non-compliance"

506 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Enforcement of Deemed Membership Order Under Section 79(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Incorrect Citation of Section 80(2) Does Not Invalidate Order. The court held that the Registrar has power under Section 79(2) to enforce a deemed membership order, and the order was valid despite citing the wrong section.

26 Apr 2019

The New India Cooperative Housing Society filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29 June 2015 passed by the Sub-Registrar of Cooperative Soc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Society's Refusal to Grant Membership to Purchaser of Premises. Registered Sale Deed Holder Entitled to Membership Under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Despite Developer's Objection.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Apna Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Deputy General Manager, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Neighbour for Rape of Minor Under IPC and POCSO Act — Testimony of Child Victim Found Credible Despite Minor Contradictions. The court held that the sole testimony of a minor victim, if credible, is sufficient to convict for rape, and age can be proved by school records.

31 Jan 2019

The appellant, Pramod Dattatraya Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Application for Perjury Proceedings Against Wife in Family Court Appeal. False statements in pleadings alone do not warrant prosecution under Section 340 Cr.P.C. without proof of intentional falsehood and necessity for prosecution.

25 Jan 2019

The applicant, Dr. Santosh Chandrashekar Shetty (husband), filed a Civil Application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice. Order of Supersession Under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Show Cause Notice Requirement.

14 Jan 2019

The petitioners, who were members of the Umrane Agricultural Produce Market Committee, challenged the order of supersession of the committee passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Condemns Police for Illegal Detention of Senior Citizens in Domestic Violence Case — Violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India. Police Detention of Senior Citizens Without Warrant Held Unconstitutional Under Article 21.

21 Dec 2012

The Bombay High Court dealt with a criminal writ petition filed by five petitioners, including Niraj Ramesh Jariwala, his parents (Ramesh Vitthaldas J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition to Refer Industrial Dispute to Arbitration — Industrial Disputes Under I.D. Act Are Not Arbitrable. The court held that disputes under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for recovery of wages cannot be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, a public limited company in the air transport industry, filed three writ petitions challenging the reject...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Court Fees in Suits for Declaration and Injunction — Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 Applicable Instead of Section 6(v). The Court held that suits for declaration and injunction simpliciter, without seeking possession, require court fees under Section 6(iv)(j) based on market value, not fixed fee under Section 6(v).

5 Oct 2012

The case involves a group of 31 writ petitions filed by M/s. Indrapuram Resort Apartments, a partnership firm, challenging the court fee valuation in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Restriction Order Against Iranian Nationals in Foreigners Act Case. Court upholds restriction order under Para 11(2) of Foreigners Order, 1948, holding that foreign nationals cannot claim fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(d) and (e) of Constitution.

14 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Iranian nationals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a restriction order dated 2nd Nov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Rejecting Plaint for Non-Payment of Court Fees in Suit for Specific Performance. Court Held That Under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959, Court Fees Must Be Paid on the Market Value of the Property as on the Date of Suit, Not on the Consideration Amount.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicants (original plaintiffs) against an order of the trial court rejecting their plain...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)