Bombay High Court Upholds Enforcement of Deemed Membership Order Under Section 79(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Incorrect Citation of Section 80(2) Does Not Invalidate Order. The court held that the Registrar has power under Section 79(2) to enforce a deemed membership order, and the order was valid despite citing the wrong section.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The New India Cooperative Housing Society filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29 June 2015 passed by the Sub-Registrar of Cooperative Societies, which directed an authorized officer to record the membership of Respondent No.3 with police assistance. The controversy arose from the deemed membership of Respondent No.3 under Section 23 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Deputy Registrar had allowed Respondent No.3's application for deemed membership on 7 August 2006. The society challenged this order before the Divisional Joint Registrar, who dismissed the challenge on 11 May 2007. The society then filed Writ Petition No.4567 of 2007 before the Bombay High Court, which was dismissed on 1 February 2013. An SLP from that order was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 23 April 2019. Despite these affirmations, the society did not implement the order, claiming that its SLP was pending. On Respondent No.3's application, the Deputy Registrar issued directions under Section 79 of the Act for enforcement. The society resisted, arguing that the Deputy Registrar had no power under Section 79 to enroll or record membership. Ultimately, the Sub-Registrar passed the impugned order under Section 80(2) of the Act, directing police assistance to enforce the membership. The society challenged this order on the ground that Section 79(2) does not empower the Registrar to implement a deemed membership order. The court held that the Sub-Registrar had the power under Section 79(2) of the Act to enforce the order, and the incorrect citation of Section 80(2) did not invalidate the order. The court noted that the order of deemed membership had attained finality after being upheld by the High Court and the Supreme Court, and the society was bound to implement it. The writ petition was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Deemed Membership - Enforcement - Section 79(2) Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The Registrar or his nominee has power under Section 79(2) to enforce an order of deemed membership passed under Section 23 of the Act, including by directing police assistance to access society records. The incorrect citation of Section 80(2) in the order does not invalidate it if the power exists under another provision. (Paras 2, 5-6)

B) Cooperative Societies - Jurisdiction - Incorrect Citation of Section - Validity - Section 79(2) Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - An order passed under an incorrect section is not void if the authority had the power to pass it under a different section. The court may treat the order as passed under the correct provision. (Para 5)

C) Cooperative Societies - Deemed Membership - Finality - Res Judicata - Section 23 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Once an order of deemed membership has been affirmed by the High Court and the Supreme Court, it attains finality and cannot be re-agitated. The society is bound to implement it. (Paras 3, 7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Sub-Registrar of Cooperative Societies had the power under Section 79(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to enforce an order of deemed membership by directing police assistance, and whether the impugned order citing Section 80(2) was valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The impugned order dated 29 June 2015 passed by the Sub-Registrar of Cooperative Societies is upheld. The court held that the Sub-Registrar had the power under Section 79(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to enforce the deemed membership order, and the incorrect citation of Section 80(2) does not invalidate the order.

Law Points

  • Section 79(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960 empowers Registrar to enforce orders of deemed membership
  • Section 80(2) is not applicable for enforcement
  • incorrect citation of section does not invalidate order if power exists under another provision
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (04) 211

Writ Petition No.2022 of 2015

2019-04-26

S.C. Gupte, J.

2019:BHC-OS:9166

Mr. Vivek Walawalkar a/w Mr. Viral Amin I/b B. Amin & Co. for the Petitioner, Mr. Manish Upadhye, AGP a/w Ms. Uma Palsuledesai, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mr. Mihir R. Govilkar I/b Mr. R.V. Govilkar for Respondent No.3

New India Cooperative Housing Society

The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies And Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an order of the Sub-Registrar of Cooperative Societies directing police assistance to enforce a deemed membership order.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner society sought to quash the order dated 29 June 2015 passed by the Sub-Registrar of Cooperative Societies.

Filing Reason

The petitioner society challenged the order on the ground that the Sub-Registrar had no power under Section 79(2) of the Act to implement an order of deemed membership.

Previous Decisions

The Deputy Registrar allowed deemed membership on 7 August 2006; Divisional Joint Registrar dismissed challenge on 11 May 2007; Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.4567 of 2007 on 1 February 2013; Supreme Court dismissed SLP on 23 April 2019.

Issues

Whether the Sub-Registrar had power under Section 79(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to enforce an order of deemed membership by directing police assistance. Whether the impugned order citing Section 80(2) instead of Section 79(2) is invalid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that under Section 79(2) of the Act, the Registrar has no power to implement an order of deemed membership passed under Section 23. Respondent argued that the order was valid and the power existed under Section 79(2).

Ratio Decidendi

The Registrar or his nominee has the power under Section 79(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to enforce an order of deemed membership passed under Section 23 of the Act. An order passed under an incorrect section is not void if the authority had the power to pass it under a different section. The court may treat the order as passed under the correct provision.

Judgment Excerpts

Although the SubRegistrar has passed a correct order, as shall presently appear, the Section relied on for passing the order, namely, Section 80(2), appears to be incorrect. The Registrar and his nominee has the requisite power to pass such order under Section 79 Subsection (2) of the Act.

Procedural History

The Deputy Registrar allowed deemed membership on 7 August 2006. The society challenged this before the Divisional Joint Registrar, who dismissed the challenge on 11 May 2007. The society filed Writ Petition No.4567 of 2007, which was dismissed on 1 February 2013. An SLP was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 23 April 2019. Meanwhile, on Respondent No.3's application, the Deputy Registrar issued directions under Section 79. The society resisted, and the Sub-Registrar passed the impugned order on 29 June 2015 under Section 80(2), directing police assistance. The society filed the present writ petition challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 23, Section 79, Section 79(2), Section 80, Section 80(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Enforcement of Deemed Membership Order Under Section 79(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Incorrect Citation of Section 80(2) Does Not Invalidate Order. The court held that the Registrar has power under S...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Granted by Sub-Divisional Officer Instead of Collector Held Incompetent, Despite Satisfactory Evidence of Demand and Acceptance.