Search Results for "maharashtra revenue tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "maharashtra revenue tribunal"

1304 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1304 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Revisional Order in Land Conversion Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Change Land Use Upheld. Deputy Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

26 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Satish Hegde, purchased four acres of land in Sy.No.58 (New Sy.No.141) at Singrahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, under a registered s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

7 May 2010

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Purchaser of Land Challenging Tenant's Right to Purchase Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The court held that the tenant's application under Section 32(G) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was maintainable despite an earlier uncommunicated order, and the purchaser from the landlord cannot defeat the tenant's rights.

19 Mar 2013

The dispute pertains to agricultural land Survey No.173 (Gat No.213) situated at village Pachwad, taluka Wai, district Satara. The original landlord w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Is Mandatory and Unjust Enrichment Applies to Pre-deposit Refunds. The court held that the one-year limitation for refund claims cannot be extended and the claimant must prove no passing of duty burden.

8 Mar 2024

The case involves two connected matters: an appeal by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane Rural, against an order of the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Claim for Depreciation on Share Issue Expenses Capitalised to Plant and Machinery. Expenditure on Raising Share Capital Not Part of Actual Cost Under Section 32 of Income Tax Act, 1961, and Falls Under Section 35D as Preliminary Expenses.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment ye...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

6 Jan 2022

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition by Tenants in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32F(1) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act Mandates Tenant to Give Intimation Within One Year of Widow Landlady's Death; Failure to Do So Extinguishes Right to Purchase. Landlady's earlier exercise of right under Section 31(1) to resume land for personal cultivation does not dispense with the statutory requirement of notice under Section 32F(1), and non-compliance results in loss of tenancy right and possession reverting to landlord under Section 32P.

3 Jun 2019

The dispute arose from a tenancy over agricultural land in Satara district. The petitioners were tenants in possession since the tillers' day, and the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Compassionate Appointment Based on Ad-Hoc Promotee Father's Service. Compassionate appointment scheme does not extend to dependents of ad-hoc promotees whose promotion was never confirmed.

15 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Nikhil Maruti Gosarade, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 25 June 2018, whi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Stay Order in Cenvat Credit Dispute. Tribunal's Detailed Findings at Stay Stage Prejudge the Appeal and Are Impermissible.

4 Mar 2015

The appellant, CEAT Limited, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th June 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and ...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)