Search Results for "directory rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "directory rules"

556 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 556 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice. Order of Supersession Under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Show Cause Notice Requirement.

14 Jan 2019

The petitioners, who were members of the Umrane Agricultural Produce Market Committee, challenged the order of supersession of the committee passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Execution Stay Order in Property Dispute — Delay Condonation Application Not Maintainable Without Appeal. Held that an application for condonation of delay cannot be filed before the appeal is registered and that the appellate court cannot stay execution proceedings without hearing the decree-holder.

24 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Luis Antonio Romualdo Jesus de Maria Jose De Abreu (since deceased, represented by his LR Maria Do Ceu Abreu), obtained a judgment and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Tribunal Order Refusing to Treat Company's Closure Application as Withdrawn. Held that the Tribunal's refusal was not perverse and the Union's application was premature under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Jan 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the General Motors Employees Union challenging an order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 28.04.2023 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appellate Order Denying GST Refund on Export of Services to Overseas Entity, Holds Non-Submission of FIRCs Not Fatal When Alternative Proof Exists. The Court Rules that Services Provided on Principal-to-Principal Basis Are Not Intermediary Services Under Section 2(13) of IGST Act, and Directs Refund.

22 Aug 2024

The petitioner, a company providing information technology and software services, filed four applications for refund of unutilized input tax credit (I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award for Rabies Vaccine Supply. Performance Certificate Not in Prescribed Proforma Held Directory, Not Mandatory, as Substantial Compliance and Public Interest Justify Award.

3 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Bharat Biotech International Ltd, challenged the grant of a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) for the su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Appellate Reversal of No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch under Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The Petition Raises Issue of Non-Service of No Confidence Motion Notice on Sarpanch Despite Participation in Meeting.

23 Aug 2012

The writ petition arose from a dispute over the validity of a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Varkhedi Gram Panchayat under the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Failure to Move Resolution in Special Meeting Renders Motion Invalid and Attracts Bar Under Section 35(3-A) Against Fresh Motion for One Year.

9 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Savita Shrimant Ghule (Sarpanch) and Ganesh Vishnu Hagawne (Upa-Sarpanch) of Grampanchayat Ukkadgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Revision under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Holding Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies. The Court ruled that a revision under Section 201-B is a 'petition' covered by Section 239-B, which expressly incorporates Sections 4, 5, 12, and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and no provision excludes condonation of delay.

7 Aug 2017

The dispute arose from a demolition order issued by the Village Panchayat of Queula against the petitioner for alleged illegal construction, based on ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Grama Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the notice period is mandatory, not directory, and quashed the notice that provided only 7 days instead of the required 15 days.

11 Sep 2019

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging notices for no-confidence mot...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)