Search Results for "consolidated petitions"

394 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 394 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Air Force School Not Being 'State' Under Article 12. Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Available Against Air Force School Managed by Non-Government Society Funded by Non-Public Funds.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals challenging the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which held that the Air Force School, Bamrauli, is ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Cross Petitions in Industrial Dispute — Upholds Illegal Termination but Awards Compensation Instead of Reinstatement. Labour Court's finding of illegal retrenchment upheld, but compensation of Rs. 3 lakh substituted for reinstatement and backwages.

The judgment concerns two cross petitions arising from an industrial dispute between M/s. Yashmun Engineers Ltd (employer) and Sudhir Jagannath Kulkar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted to Workman. Termination of a workman without conducting a proper domestic enquiry and without providing opportunity to cross-examine management witnesses was held illegal and unjustified.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The first petition (WP No. 33097 of 2018) w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Amalgamation Scheme Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 — No Objections Raised by Regional Director or Official Liquidator. Court Held Scheme Fair and Reasonable and Not Contrary to Public Interest.

The Bombay High Court, exercising its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, considered two company petitions filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Co...