Search Results for "appellate forum"

2223 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2223 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes NCLT Order for Violation of Rule 89 of NCLT Rules, 2016 — Lack of Proper Notice for Pronouncement of Judgment. Failure to Upload Cause List in Advance and Sudden Pronouncement Without Intimation to Parties Constitutes Breach of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Umang Haribhai Thakkar and others, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging the judgment dated 09.02.2026 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Coastal Zone Violation Orders Due to Alternative Remedy Under NGT Act. Petitioners failed to establish pre-1991 construction and could not bypass statutory appeal under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Prasad Naik and Rosalina de Souza against orders of the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Notice of Motion for Rejection of Plaint in Trust Suit Under Order VII Rule 10A CPC. The Court Examines Whether Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 10A CPC and Limitation Bar the Freshly Filed Suit.

The matter arose from a Notice of Motion taken out by defendant no.7 in a trust dispute suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The plaintiff claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Sale Price. Condition Precedent Under Rule 9(3) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Not Fulfilled, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Available.

The petitioner, an individual aged about 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Finds Reliance Companies Guilty of Contempt for Breach of Undertakings to Pay INR 550 Crore to Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. The court held that the undertakings making payment conditional upon sale of assets were contrary to the court's order and constituted wilful disobedience.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. against Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Teleco...