Search Results for "agreement holder"

2025 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2025 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Ownership Based on Revenue Records and Prior Adjudication. Tenancy Claim and Agreement of Sale Rejected as Not Proved and Inconsistent with Earlier Proceedings.

The case pertains to a Second Appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and order dated 7.4.2007 passed by the Princip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiffs' Regular Second Appeal Challenging Dismissal of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Over Inam Land. Regrant of Land Under Karnataka Village Office Abolition Act During Pendency of Suit Does Not Prove Antecedent Ownership or Possession.

The case involves a regular second appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Execution Petition as Time-Barred in Specific Performance Case. Dismissal of Appeal for Want of Prosecution Does Not Constitute Merger of Decree and Limitation Period Runs from Date of Trial Court Decree Absent Stay of Execution.

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The predecessor of the petitioners (plaintiff) had e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Possessory Title Not Required for Restoration Under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC. High Court erred in ordering restoration of possession without determining whether respondent had any right to possession under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had allowed the appeal of the respondent (Lt. Col. Nahar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Application Under Section 482 CrPC Seeking Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Applicant Challenges Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 and Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Inquiry in Cheque Dishonour Case.

The applicant preferred a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the proceedings in a complaint u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...