Search Results for "advocate duty"

10250 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10250 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Duty on Captive Consumption — Industrial Consumers Not Entitled to Exemption Under Section 3(1)(b) of Goa Electricity Duty Act, 1985 as Self-Generated Electricity Not Supplied by Licensee or Generating Company.

The petitioners, a group of industrial companies and their directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Central Excise Notification on Tobacco Products. Challenge to Notification No.3/2019 under Central Excise Act, 1944 Alleged Violation of Constitutional and Statutory Provisions.

A batch of writ petitions was filed by several manufacturers of tobacco and tobacco products under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchaser's Petition Against Octroi Demand on Customs-Auctioned Goods. The court held that octroi liability on goods already stored in a warehouse and auctioned by Customs falls on the municipal corporation, not the purchaser.

The petitioner, M/s. DK Enterprises, was the successful bidder in a public auction conducted by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai, on 24 October 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSFC's Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Mortgagee Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Section 31E of SFC Act, 1951 Does Not Confer Right to Sue for Specific Performance of Third-Party Contracts.

The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) filed writ petitions challenging the order of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore, dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Refund of Excess Stamp Duty Paid by Company in Stamp Duty Refund Case — Respondents Directed to Refund Rs.10,11,810/- with Interest. Petitioner Entitled to Refund Under Section 48 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 as Claim Was Within Limitation and Excess Payment Admitted.

The petitioner, Dalmiya Cement Venture Limited, a public limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, got registered several lands...