Search Results for "advertisement rights"

1056 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1056 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Approval for Appointment of Full Time Instructor in Minority College. Petitioner's Appointment as FTI (MLT) Held Valid as She Possessed Required Qualifications and Was Appointed Against a Vacant Post.

The petitioner, Miss Seema Shitalaprasad Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 22nd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Appointment as Shikshan Sahayak Due to Non-Completion of B.Ed. Degree Within Prescribed Time Limit. Selection List Placement Does Not Confer Indefeasible Right to Appointment When Candidate Fails to Meet Essential Qualification Deadline.

The petitioner, Solanki Digvijaysinh Bharatsinh, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Teacher in Illegal Termination Case. Appointment Without Approval Renders Reinstatement Inappropriate; Section 11(2)(e) of MEPS Act Applied for Six Months' Salary Compensation.

The petitioner, Shri Charudatta Ramchandra Bagadi, was employed as a teacher at Bramhaling Vidyalaya Hajgoli, a school run by Respondent No.1 (Shetkar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Selection Process for Lower Division Clerk Posts. Selection based on merit and reservation policy upheld as valid and non-arbitrary.

The petitioner, Anil Damu Murgaonkar, a government servant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.

The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...