C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2023
12 Mar 2025The plaintiff, VGN Projects Estates Private Limited, filed commercial suit no.205 of 2023 against the defendants, M/s. VGK Builders Pvt. Ltd. and M/s....
Search Results for "Tax invoice"
389 result(s) found
Found 389 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Provisional Attachment Orders Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — Lack of Reasonable Belief and Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Attachment orders set aside as customs authorities failed to demonstrate reasonable belief that goods were liable to confiscation and did not follow mandatory procedure under Section 110(3) requiring notice within six months.
13 Mar 2024The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Chokshi Arvind Jewellers and Pallav Gold, challenging provisional attachment orders passed by t...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.
31 Aug 2020The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...
- 187
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.
24 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...
- 409
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.
8 May 2013These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...
- 32
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Criminal Petition Under Section 482 CrPC Seeking Quashing of Private Complaint for Alleged Forgery and Cheating. The Petitioners, Accused Nos. 4 to 6, Alleged that the Complaint Was Civil in Nature and Filed After Unexplained Delay.
6 Oct 2023The petitioners, accused Nos. 4 to 6 in private complaint P.C.R.No.74 of 2022, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pro...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.
18 Aug 2017The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...
- 96
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.
10 Feb 2026The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019 where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...
- 323
