Search Results for "Stamp Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Stamp Rules"

1134 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1134 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Suit for Specific Performance Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Refusal to Execute Sale Deed in 2018.

4 Sep 2025

The appellants, Sri K.T. Govinde Gowda and Smt. G. Anuradha, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SFC Petition Against Guarantors Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act, 1951 — Guarantors Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Guarantee is a separate contract and liability of guarantor is co-extensive with principal debtor under Section 128 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

7 Jun 2005

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 ag...

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree in Housing Board Flat Sale Agreement — Agreement Holder Entitled to Enforce Contract Despite Non-Joinder of Legal Heirs as Parties. The court held that the suit for specific performance is maintainable as the estate of the deceased defendant is sufficiently represented by the other defendants who were parties to the agreement.

7 Jan 2026

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 23.06.1983 filed by the 1st respondent/plaintiff against defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disinvestment of BPCL and Repeal of Burmah Shell Act — Strategic Disinvestment Policy Not Subject to Legislative Mandate for Prior Parliamentary Approval. The court held that the executive is competent to decide disinvestment under Article 73, and the repeal of the Burmah Shell Act by Finance Act 2016 is valid, with no right of first refusal for employees or dealers.

12 Nov 2020

The judgment concerns four petitions challenging the Union of India's decision to disinvest its shareholding in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Criminal Quashing Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Criminal Proceedings Under Section 482 CrPC Without Considering Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Forgery and Cheating in Sale Deed Execution Require Trial, Not Quashing at Threshold.

4 Nov 2025

The appellant-complainant lodged a private complaint against the private respondents alleging offences under Sections 120B, 201, 419, 471, 468 and 420...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund with Interest from Date of Deposit in Consumer Dispute Against Agra Development Authority for Delayed Possession Without Completion Certificate. The Court held that an offer of possession without completion certificate is invalid, and the allottee is entitled to interest from the date of deposit under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

3 Sep 2024

The appellant, Dharmendra Sharma, applied for allotment of a flat in a project by the Agra Development Authority (ADA) in 2011 and paid the full price...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Against Dismissal of Interim Injunction Applications in Suit for Recovery of Mortgage Debt. Appellant Sought to Restrain Further Mortgage and Commercial Operations Pending Suit.

23 Nov 2024

The appeal arose from a recovery suit filed by M/s Gaurav Rose Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. against M/s Blue Horizon Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and others for Rs.5 cro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging District Deputy Registrar's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute — Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Registrar's Order Quashed as It Was Passed Without Hearing the Petitioner Society and Without Considering Its Objections Under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

10 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Garodia Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., through its Honorary Secretary, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15th June,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entry and Recovery Notice Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Petitioner failed to avail statutory remedy of appeal under Section 49 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 before approaching the High Court under Article 226.

25 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Smt. Rajeshwari W/o. Muttanna Biraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Cou...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)