Search Results for "Senior Citizens Tribunal"

313 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 313 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to Regularization of Daily Wage Safai Kamgars. Industrial Court's Order to Confer Permanent Status Upheld as Employees Worked Continuously and Were Denied Benefits Unfairly.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by the Alibag Municipal Council and its Chief Officer challenging orders of the Industrial Court date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Government's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Temporary Employees in Government Hospitals. Back Door Entry Without Selection Process Disqualifies Claim for Regularisation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The State Government filed eight petitions challenging a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Satara, which had directed continuation of services ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Discriminatory Age of Superannuation for Taluka Health Officers. Differential treatment between Taluka Health Officers and District Health Officers/Civil Surgeons regarding retirement age violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, seven Taluka Health Officers employed in the Public Health Department of the Government of Maharashtra, challenged the Government Res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction Against Newspaper in Defamation Suit. Court Restrains Publication of Defamatory Articles About Plaintiff and Family Pending Trial, Holding That Per Se Defamatory Statements Without Justification Cannot Be Published.

The plaintiff, Gokulchand Govindlal Sananda, filed Regular Civil Suit No.17 of 2013 seeking damages of Rs.25,00,000 for per se defamatory publications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge Order Setting Aside Administrative Permission for Milk Collection. Fraud Allegation Not Proven as Proposal Was Complete at Time of Application.

The appellant, Subhas Anna Kool, challenged the judgment and order dated 25-10-2005 of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petitio...