High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation. Case Involves Actions of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Under B.M.C. Act, 1888.
17 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Order XXIII"
433 result(s) found
Found 433 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Complainant's Appeal Against High Court Order Permitting Additional Evidence on Insanity Plea in Murder Case. High Court's Order Set Aside as Issue of Mental Fitness at Time of Incident Was Already Concluded by Earlier Orders.
6 Dec 2022The case arises from a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Lakhan Singh, against an order of the High Court of Delhi. The High Court had allowed...
- 147
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Class Action by Homebuyers Under Section 35(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Builder's Objection on Miniscule Percentage Rejected. Commonality of Interest Found in Delay in Possession and Unfair Trade Practices, Allowing Representative Complaint for All 1134 Apartment Purchasers.
17 Dec 2021The case involves an appeal by Brigade Enterprises Limited, a builder, against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)...
- 432
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Immediate Halt to Stubble Burning and Construction Activities in Delhi-NCR to Combat Air Pollution — Violation of Article 21 Right to Life. The Court held that failure of state governments and local authorities to prevent pollution-causing activities violates the right to life and makes them liable for tortious acts and contempt of court.
4 Nov 2019The Supreme Court was hearing interlocutory applications in the ongoing M.C. Mehta v. Union of India writ petition concerning environmental pollution,...
- 186
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Drivers' Appeal for Higher Pay Scales in Tamil Nadu Government Service. The court held that drivers are entitled to Selection Grade and Special Grade pay scales of Rs. 5000-8000 and Rs. 5500-9000 under G.O. Ms. No. 162, rejecting the State's contention based on incorrect interpretation of the Government Order.
26 Jul 2019The appeals arose from a common judgment of the Madras High Court dismissing writ petitions filed by drivers in various departments of the Government ...
- 179
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Grounds Were Served in English, Not in Kannada Which Detenu Understood.
2 Jun 2016The petitioner, Smt. Shylamma, mother of the detenu Abhishek @ Abhi @ Sutta, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Liquidator in Recovery Suit Against Bank for Wrongful Payment After Liquidation — Bank Liable to Pay Fixed Deposit Amount to Liquidator Despite Payment to Company Director After Winding Up.
1 Apr 2015The plaintiff, Gowribidanur Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd., a co-operative society under liquidation, filed a suit for recovery of money against India...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Ex Parte Injunction Order for Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC — Trial Court Failed to Record Reasons or Issue Notice to Defendants Before Granting Temporary Injunction.
26 Mar 2014The petitioners, who were defendants in a civil suit (O.S. No. 115/2011) pending before the Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and JMFC, Nagamangala, challenged an...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.
12 Mar 2014The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...
- 89
