High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Group of Writ Petitions by University Employees. No adjudicative details available in the provided text.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Investigation extension"
759 result(s) found
Found 759 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.
16 Aug 2018The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Application Under Section 434 Companies Act Seeking Transfer of Winding-Up Petition to NCLT. Applicant Argues No Irreversible Steps Taken, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.
23 Jun 2026The matter arose from a Company Petition filed in 2010 seeking winding up of Broadcast Infratel India Private Limited on grounds of unpaid admitted de...
- 30
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Industrial Development Board in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Board's Failure to Prove Title and Possession Leads to Dismissal. The court held that the Board, as a statutory authority, must prove its title and possession before seeking eviction, and its failure to do so results in dismissal of the appeal.
26 Apr 2016The appeal was filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) and its officers against the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2012 pas...
- 66
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Army Offence Jurisdiction Dispute, Restoring Sessions Court Trial. Concurrent Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Army Act, 1950 Upheld, with Commanding Officer's Discretion Exercised Through Cooperation with Civil Investigation.
1 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Sikkim, which upheld an order of the Sessions Judge directing that the accused, an Army personne...
- 228
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Italian Marines in Maritime Shooting Case Based on UNCLOS Arbitral Award and Compensation Settlement. The Court exercised powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to close all proceedings, including FIR and bail bonds, after Italy deposited Rs. 10 crores as compensation and all parties agreed to the arbitral award under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982.
15 Jun 2022The dispute arose from an incident on 15 February 2012, where two Indian fishermen were killed off the coast of Kerala after being fired upon from the...
- 281
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.
19 Oct 2015The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...
- 16
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Auction Purchaser Not in Default. Delay in Payment Attributable to Bank's Own Actions and External Factors, Not Purchaser's Fault Under Rule 9(4) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.
4 Oct 2024The appellant, IDBI Bank, conducted an e-auction on 10.04.2018 for a property comprising 2 guntas of land in Telangana. The respondents were the highe...
- 879
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Desilting Policy Tender Conditions as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Petitioners Contend Conditions Violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and Disregard Court's Directive in PIL No.143 of 2012.
18 Mar 2019The High Court of Bombay heard four connected writ petitions challenging certain conditions stipulated in a Government Resolution dated 03.08.2018 iss...
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MRTP Act Case Upholding Commission's Finding of No Unfair Trade Practices. The Court Held That Extra Charges and Cancellation of Apartment Allotment Were Contractual and Did Not Constitute Unfair Trade Practices Under Sections 36-A and 36-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.
25 Jan 2022The appeal arose from a judgment dated 19.01.2009 by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, which dismissed a complaint...
- 193
