High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition No. 403 of 2022 and P.I.L. Writ Petition No. 32 of 2022. The Court adjudicated connected matters involving multiple respondents and state/government authorities.
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "Ban"
686 result(s) found
Found 686 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Teacher Seeking Salary as per Government Resolution — Held that Private Aided School Must Pay Salary as per Government Resolution and Not Less Than Minimum of Pay Scale. The court directed payment of arrears with interest at 6% per annum.
13 Dec 2018The petitioner, Sanjay s/o Umaji Kamble, an assistant teacher at Panchsheel Primary School, Nanded, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...
- 179
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Shalarth Identity Despite Deputy Director's Objection to Approval. Approval by Education Officer (Secondary) is binding on Deputy Director for Shalarth identity purposes.
21 Nov 2025The petitioners, including a teacher (Petitioner No.1) and the school management, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondent authoriti...
- 115
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Investigation and Management of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri — Ratna Bhandar Keys Disappearance and Pilgrim Facilities Addressed. Court Orders Reports from District Judge, State, and Central Governments, and Appoints Amicus Curiae for Temple Preservation and Management Under Article 32 of the Constitution.
4 Nov 2019The Supreme Court of India was approached by way of a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, Mrinalini Padhi, ...
- 250
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Pharmacy Council of India's Moratorium on New Pharmacy Colleges Under Pharmacy Act, 1948. Regulatory Power to Impose Moratorium Valid as Reasonable Restriction Under Article 19(6) to Prevent Mushrooming Growth and Unemployment.
15 Sep 2022The Supreme Court of India addressed appeals filed by the Pharmacy Council of India challenging judgments from the High Courts of Karnataka, Delhi, an...
- 187
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Rajasthan's Gutka Notification for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that no part of cause of action arose within Karnataka as the notification was issued in Rajasthan, the petitioner resides in Rajasthan, and all respondents are outside Karnataka.
15 Dec 2017The petitioner, Rahul Joshi, a resident of Jaipur, Rajasthan, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka challenging ...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Heard Petition to Quash Process Issued in Tax Evasion Complaint under Section 276-C(2) of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Argued That Nil Dues Certificate and Full Payment of Tax, Penalty, and Interest Negated the Allegation of Wilful Attempt to Evade Tax.
28 Jul 2026The present matter arose from a criminal writ petition filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa under Article 226 of the Constitution of India rea...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.
1 Jan 1970These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of School Employees Seeking Salary Arrears and Regularization — Held that Employees are Entitled to Salary as per Government Resolutions and Regularization from Date of Initial Appointment.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by employees of aided primary schools in Jalgaon, Maharashtra. The petitioners, including clerks and ...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Declines to Answer Reference on Academic Issue When Underlying Writ Petition Disposed of. Full Bench holds that a larger bench cannot answer a reference for academic purposes when the cause is not live.
21 Jan 2021The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur was constituted to resolve a conflict of opinion between two Division Bench decisions: Saroj Iyer v....
- 47
