Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6428 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6428 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Enhanced from Rs. 60,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare. The Court held that the Reference Court failed to consider potentiality of land and comparable sale instances, warranting enhancement under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

3 Mar 2020

The case involves three first appeals filed by the original claimants (Ushabai Pawar, Manesh Pawar, and Balasaheb Pawar) against the State of Maharash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Public Interest Litigation and Writ Petition Concerning Illegal Shopping Complex Construction; Directions for Sealing and Cancellation of Allotments Upheld. The Court Holds that Allottees Under Leave and License Agreements Acquire No Rights When Construction is Unauthorised and Violates Section 51(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

13 Feb 2019

The dispute arose from the construction of a shopping complex by Gram Panchayat Sirsala on land bearing Gut No.343, which was the only open space in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence of Pregnancy Confirm Offences Under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 IPC.

24 Feb 2015

The appellant, Ravindra @ Balu s/o Sonaji Hivrale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal of Husband and Family and Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty. Circumstantial Evidence Including Medical Report and Accused's Conduct Established Guilt Under Section 302 IPC, While Dowry Demand Supported 498A Conviction; Criminal Intimidation Charges Set Aside.

22 Apr 2014

The case arose out of the death of a young married woman, Varsha, who died within five months of her marriage to appellant no.1 Milind Bankar. Varsha ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioners' Writ Petitions for Full Pension Benefits Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service Rules. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and cannot be withheld or reduced arbitrarily; respondents directed to pay full pension with interest.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, seeking full pension and pensionary benefits...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Will Proved in Manner Required by Law. Court holds that a will executed by a Muslim testator is governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and must be proved in accordance with Section 63(c) and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a first appeal against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad, in Special Civil Suit No. 5 of 2000,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Temporary Teaching Staff Seeking Reinstatement and Regularisation — Temporary Appointments Do Not Confer Right to Continue. Termination of Ad Hoc Employees on Expiry of Term Is Not Illegal and No Writ Lies for Enforcement of Contract of Personal Service.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, seven individuals employed as Assistant Professors and Lecturers at Shri Bhagwan College of Pharmacy, Aurangabad, filed a writ petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Assistant Teachers Challenging Termination Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of MEPS Act. Termination Orders Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice and Statutory Mandate.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, ten assistant teachers employed by Vinay Shikshan Sanstha (respondent no.4), filed writ petitions challenging their termination of se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Government Employees in SC/ST Atrocities Case — Allegations of Caste-Based Insults Found Prima Facie Not Made Out. Court Held That Mere Allegations Without Specific Utterances in Public View Do Not Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

5 Apr 2019

The judgment arises from three criminal appeals filed by government employees (Ratnakala Martandrao Mohite, Govind Pandit Chaudhary, and Dr. Swapnil V...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)