KAHC010451182019_1
14 Feb 2020...
Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"
3429 result(s) found
Found 3429 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case, Restores Decree; Advocate's No-Instruction Puris Not a Withdrawal of Vakalatnama Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Evasive Litigant Cannot Claim Lack of Opportunity When Advocate Sent RPAD Notice and No Formal Withdrawal of Vakalatnama Occurred.
1 Jan 1970The dispute arose from a civil suit for possession filed by the landlord-appellant under Sections 16(1)(g) and 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Sanction — Proceedings Initiated Without Mandatory Sanction Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Are Void Ab Initio.
22 Aug 2017The petitioners, Rukhman w/o Manohar Agale, Sunita w/o Sunil Sohale, and Savita w/o Digambar Pathade, were original accused nos. 4 to 6 in Sessions Ca...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Accused in Securities Scam Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inordinate Delay. Petitioners were directors of a company accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy in securities transactions, but the court found no prima facie case and held that the 25-year delay violated their right to speedy trial.
22 Aug 2023The petitioners, Dhyan Investments & Trading Company Ltd. and Tushar Sarda, were accused nos. 3 and 4 in Special Case No.2 of 1998 pending before the ...
- 178
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.
23 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...
- 630
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Goa Rent Act. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Personal Occupation Upheld as Genuine and Based on Evidence.
11 Oct 2013The petitioners, Michael Anthony William Gareth and Amelia Gareth, were tenants in a house bearing Municipal no. 73, Panaji, Goa, which was acquired b...
- 377
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Guarantors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Enforcement Case, Upholding Sale of Mortgaged Properties. The Court held that multiple litigations by guarantors constitute abuse of process and cannot defeat the expeditious recovery mechanism under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
23 Sep 2021The Supreme Court of India dealt with civil appeals arising from special leave petitions challenging a common judgment of the Madras High Court. The d...
- 307
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tenants' Petition in Rent Enhancement Dispute — Rent Controller's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The court held that the Rent Controller must hear the tenants before directing deposit of arrears at enhanced rate under Section 22(3) of the Goa Rent Control Act.
14 Jun 2023The petitioners, tenants of a premises rented at ₹20 per month, received a notice from the landlord on 15.04.2010 seeking enhancement of rent to ₹...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 4 and Declaration Under Section 6 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Statutory Requirements or Principles of Natural Justice.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, residents of Pernem, Goa, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for the construction of a road by the State...
- 76
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Goa Rent Control Act. Tenant's Irregular Rent Payment and Subletting Justify Eviction Under Sections 22(a) and 22(b)(i) and (ii) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.
1 Feb 2018The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased tenant Gurudas Narayan Salgaonkar, challenged an order dated 03/01/2014 passed by the Appellate...
- 67
