Search Results for "retrospective policy"

483 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Retrospective Promotion to Mukhya Sevika Post. Petitioner, an Aanganwadi worker, was promoted during pendency of petition but claimed seniority from 2010; court held no right to retrospective promotion as she was not eligible at that time.

The petitioner, an Aanganwadi worker, filed a writ petition under Articles 14 and 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CRB Order Imposing Cost Recovery Charges on CFS Operator. Policy Decision Not Subject to Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sarveshwar Logistics Services Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.

The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of MSEDCL Employees — Transfer Policy Upheld as Binding. Allegations of Mala Fides Not Entertained Without Impleading the Officer.

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), challenged their transfer orders issued by the company...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...