Search Results for "recovery of weapon"

270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Brother-in-Law Killing Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 449 and 302 IPC.

The appellant, Laxman Pandurang Pawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for offences punishable under Sections 449 (house-trespass in or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Brother-in-Law in Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of sister-in-law based on motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Santaji Waman Gopale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his sister-in-law, Smt. Jayashre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC and Arms Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and identity of assailants beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of V.G. Patil, a college lecturer and political activist, on 21 September 2005. The prosecution alleged that the decea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for strangulation of wife set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nilesh Laxmikant Vyas, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for the murder of his wife, Neha @ Pooja, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 363 and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Barkya @ Vishwas Ananda Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur, for the murder of a 12-year-old boy, Kuldeep, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Chain of Circumstances Including Last Seen, Recovery of Weapon, and Absence of Explanation Under Section 106 of Evidence Act Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sameerkumar Prakash Awasare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Sessions Case No. 8/2007 for the murder of h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspicion of Character. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of his sister with axe due to suspicion about her character.

The appellant, Pramod @ Pintya s/o Bhaurao Bodkhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, District Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.10/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon was complete and consistent with guilt.

The appellant, Riyaz @ Bablu Sattar Mujawar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for the murder of one person under Section...