Search Results for "landlord's discretion"

371 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 371 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints Against Newspaper Publisher for Lack of Vicarious Liability Under Negotiable Instruments Act. Publisher Not Liable for Dishonour of Cheques Issued by Employees Without Authorisation.

The petitioner, Lokmat Media Private Limited, a newspaper publishing company, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compounding of NI Act Offence Despite Complainant's Objection. Payment of Full Cheque Amount with Interest and Costs Entitles Accused to Compounding Under Section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The applicants, who were accused in a criminal complaint filed by the respondent-company under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010102062008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Order Under Section 133 CrPC for Non-Compliance with Conditional Order Requirement. The court held that the mandatory procedure under Section 133 CrPC was not followed as no conditional order was passed, and the report was misinterpreted.

The applicant, Shrikant Shankarrao Agnihotri, challenged an order dated 6 June 2017 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Akola under Section 133 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...