Search Results for "hindu undivided family"

482 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 482 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase of Land Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court Upheld the Revenue Tribunal's Order Confirming the Tenant's Purchase, Finding No Error of Law or Fact.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners (original applicants/landlords) and the respondents (original non-applicants/tenants) concerning a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree Based on Oral Agreement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With in Second Appeal. Oral Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property Proved by Evidence; Written Document Dated 31.12.1973 Did Not Supersede Earlier Oral Agreement.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants challenging concurrent judgments and decrees passed for specific performance of an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment Warrant in Maintenance Case for Lack of Notice Under Section 125 CrPC. Failure to Serve Notice Before Issuing Warrant Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dharam Shevaram Rajpal, challenged an order dated 31st December 2004 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Uran, issuing a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Injunction and Declaration Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Over Suit Property.

The appellant, Sri B.N. Devaraju, filed a second appeal before the Karnataka High Court against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC fails as no substantial question of law arises from concurrent findings of courts below regarding declaration of title and injunction.

The appellant, Maruti A/F Laxman Patil, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property, and That the Trial Court Erred in Decreeing the Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. Th...