Search Results for "discretionary orders"

1979 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1979 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Appellate Order Granting Temporary Injunction in Partition Suit. Interim Restraint Granted by District Judge Over Disputed Ancestral Lands Admeasuring 3 Acres Pending Suit.

The matter pertains to a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging an order passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GULFISHA FATIMA

The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Plea to Quash Impleadment of Company in SFIO Prosecution. Application Under Section 319 CrPC Allowed by Magistrate Challenged by Former Managing Director.

The petitioner, former Managing Director of Megacity (Bangalore) Developers and Builders Limited, filed criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Oral Agreement Not Proved. Plaintiff failed to establish oral agreement, payment of consideration, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellants (original defendant nos. 2 to 4) challenged the judgment and decree dated 18/02/2014 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on record, not re-hearing the appeal.

The judgment pertains to a review application filed by the appellants in First Appeal No. 620 of 1996, seeking review of the judgment and order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness in Criminal Trial for Further Examination — Right to Fair Trial Includes Opportunity to Re-examine Witness on New Evidence. The Court held that rejection of recall prayer after CFSL report became available was a denial of fair trial under Section 311 CrPC.

The appellant, Satbir Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dated 14.12.2021, which rejected his pray...