Search Results for "custody requirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "custody requirement"

1664 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1664 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Second Bail Application Under PMLA Citing Long Incarceration and Speedy Trial Rights. The Court Examines Whether Constitutional Right to Speedy Trial Can Override Section 45 PMLA Bail Restrictions When Trial Is Delayed and Accused Has Been in Custody for Prolonged Period.

1 Jul 2026

The petitioner, accused No.1 in an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for offences under Sectio...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arrest in Hoarding Collapse Case — Arrest Held Valid Under Section 41 CrPC. Court finds no violation of D.K. Basu guidelines as grounds of arrest were communicated in writing and arrest memo was served.

9 Aug 2024

The case arises from a catastrophic incident on 13/05/2024 when a large hoarding (64x50 meters, 120 ft high) collapsed on a petrol pump in Mumbai duri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 23(2) of MCOCA — Conviction for Attempt to Murder Set Aside as Cognizance Without Valid Sanction is Void Ab Initio.

25 Aug 2006

The case involves three appeals filed by accused persons (original accused Nos. 3, 4, and 5) against their conviction under the Maharashtra Control of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicant in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act — Search Conducted Without Informing Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. The court held that non-compliance with Section 50 vitiates the search and the prosecution cannot rely on the recovery to oppose bail, and granted bail.

16 Dec 2025

The applicant, Krishna Vijay Gohil, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking release in connection ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay quashes FIR in Immoral Traffic Prevention Act case due to illegal search by unauthorised police officer; upholds similar FIR where search conducted by Special Police Officer. Search without warrant under Section 15 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 must be by Special Police Officer or Trafficking Police Officer; Assistant Police Inspector not authorised.

15 Oct 2016

Two writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Offences Under Section 132(1)(i) of CGST Act Are Bailable — Petitioner Entitled to Release on Bail. The court interpreted Section 132(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 to determine that offences punishable with imprisonment of five years or less are bailable, and arrest under Section 69 does not alter the bailable nature.

8 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Yogesh Jagdish Kanodia, was arrested on 30 December 2020 by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (Investigation-B), Mumbai, under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioner in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Absence of Legally Enforceable Debt. The court held that the essential ingredient of a legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was missing, and therefore the FIR was liable to be quashed.

8 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Ms. Khushi Harkishan Malhotra, filed two criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of an FIR registered ag...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Addresses Requirement of Leave Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Applicability of IBC Moratorium in Admiralty Proceedings. Court Considers Whether Admiralty Suits Are Affected by Company Liquidation Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Moratorium Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Light of Competing Claims of Maritime Creditors and Operation of Insolvency Law.

19 May 2020

The proceedings arose from multiple admiralty suits filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, wherein orders of arrest of defendant vessels...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions to Quash FIR in Criminal Conspiracy Case — Petitioners Failed to Show FIR Lacked Prima Facie Case or Was Abuse of Process. The court held that the FIR could not be quashed as the allegations required investigation and the petitioners did not demonstrate that the FIR was frivolous or vexatious under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

23 Sep 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)