Search Results for "court stay exclusion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "court stay exclusion"

742 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 742 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers First Appeal Against Denial of Specific Performance of Land Sale Agreement. The appeal challenges the trial court's finding that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness and that the contract was validly terminated.

3 Mar 2015

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale of agricultural lands situated at Maranagere Village, Tiptur Taluk. The first defendant, aged about 81 ye...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Will in Favor of Sister, Dismisses Challenge by Wife and Sons — Execution of Will Proved in Accordance with Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Court held that the propounder of the Will had discharged the burden of proving its valid execution, and the concurrent findings of the courts below were not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeal arises from a challenge to the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing the appellants' Regular Second Appeal No. 1970 of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 by Numerous Temple Trusts. Petitioners Sought Declaration that the Amendment Act is Unconstitutional and Discriminatory under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

17 Nov 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Hears Second Appeal Challenging Partial Decree in Partition Suit — Appellants Argue Suit Barred by Limitation Due to Revenue Entry Mutation in 1983.

20 Mar 2026

The matter arose from a suit filed by daughters of deceased Kachraji Aataji claiming partition of ancestral properties, specifically land bearing surv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.

27 Nov 2020

The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Consumer Protection Appointment Rules; Selection Committee Procedure Under Scrutiny. Court Considers Whether Rules Violate Article 14 and Supreme Court Directions in State of UP v. UP Consumer Protection Bar Association.

14 Sep 2021

These two petitions challenged the Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Declaration That Gond Gowari Tribe Is Extinct, Reaffirms Parliamentary Power Over Scheduled Tribes List. The Court Held That Only Parliament Can Amend the Scheduled Tribes List Under Article 342(2) of the Constitution, and Courts Cannot Tinker with Entries in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

18 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court heard appeals against a common judgment of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, dated 14.08.2018, which allowed four writ petitions ...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)